Jesus’ Extraordinary Treatment of Women – Franciscan Media
Why does Jesus eat with sinners whom the Pharisees despise? Matthew leaves his responsibilities as a tax collector behind and becomes a disciple of Jesus. (Mark ) Jesus wants to help them to attain a healthy relationship with God. Matt "Then the scribes and Pharisees who were from Jerusalem came to Jesus, saying, "Why do Your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?. The Pharisees, on the alert for any ground of accusation of Jesus and His The Pharisees did not accuse the disciples of stealing, as plucking a few . to emphasize the need of discipleship above all earthly relationships.
You give God a tenth of the spices from your garden, such as mint, dill, and cumin.
Yet you neglect the more important matters of the Law, such as justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These are the important things you should have done, though you should not have left the others undone either.
You strain out a small fly but swallow a camel. You wash the outside of your cups and dishes, while inside there is nothing but greed and selfishness. First clean the inside of a cup, and then the outside will also be clean. Outside you look good, but inside you are evil and only pretend to be good.
You build monuments for the prophets and decorate the tombs of good people. How can you escape going to hell? But you will kill them or nail them to a cross or beat them in your meeting places or chase them from town to town. Your people have killed the prophets and have stoned the messengers who were sent to you.
The Pharisees had to make a choice. They were either with Jesus or against Him. But if they were against Him, they were guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, a sin which by its nature is not forgiven vv.
There has been much misunderstanding about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Here it is properly defined as attributing to Satan what is accomplished by the power of God.
Who Were the 12 Disciples (Apostles) & What We Know about Them
Such a sin is not unpardonable in itself, but rather because it rejects the person and work of the Holy Spirit, without whom repentance and restoration are impossible. As far as it applies today, it is not the thought that one seeking pardon will not find it, but rather that one who rejects the Holy Spirit will not seek pardon. It is the ultimate in unbelief. In verse 33, He points out that a good tree brings forth good fruit and a bad tree brings forth bad fruit.
They must judge Him on the basis of His works. The unbelief of the Pharisees calls forth the strongest language. He declared that they were evil and therefore could not speak good and warned them that as unbelievers, every idle word they speak will be called to account on the day of judgment. He concluded in Matthew Unbelieving Pharisees Seek a Sign, Jesus answered them in an unsparing indictment.
He then recited the facts of the experience of Jonah, how he was three days and three nights in the great fish, and He described this as a prophetic incident, anticipating that the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. In other words, He was predicting His death and resurrection as the supreme sign for those seeking evidence of His claims.
In the incident of Jonah, the men of Nineveh repented, even though they were unbelieving Gentiles. Here Jesus, who was far greater than Jonah, was before His own people, and they would not believe. Jesus cited another illustration of the queen of the south who heard and believed in the wisdom of Solomon 1 Ki Now a greater than Solomon was here, and the Jews would not believe. Again the illustration is of belief among the Gentiles which would emphasize the point He was making to the Pharisees.
In concluding His talk with the Pharisees, Jesus pointed out the emptiness of religion without the supernatural power of God. His house, however, although swept and garnished, was empty.
These were inflammatory acts in a city that, at festival time, was prone to uprisings that could lead to the death of many thousands of Jews. Caiaphas probably had the thought that John This phrase could have been interpreted several ways, but it certainly did not mean that Rome would continue to govern Judaea.
Many people resented Roman rule, and Rome was quick to dispatch those who became too vocal in their opposition. Nevertheless, Pilate did not think that Jesus and his followers constituted a military threat. Had he thought so, he would have had the disciples, too, executed, either at the time or when they returned to Jerusalem to take up their new mission.
Instead, the prefect limited his actions to their charismatic leader and turned Jesus over to his soldiers for execution. They took him and two thieves outside Jerusalem and crucified them. He was dangerous, and his execution is perfectly understandable in this historical context; that is, he was executed for being what he was, an eschatological prophet. Caiaphas and his councillors fulfilled their mandate to keep the peace and suppress any signs of an uprising.
Pilate presumably acted from similar motives. It is unlikely that the responsible parties lost much sleep over their decision; they were doing their duty. The Resurrection What happened next changed history in a way quite different from what Jesus seems to have anticipated.
Some of his followers claimed to have seen him after his death. While still in Jerusalem, the two Marys saw Jesus, who told them the same thing, and he appeared once more, to the disciples in Galilee.
Later, Jesus appeared to two followers on the road to Emmaus near Jerusalemthen to Peter, and later to the disciples. John now including chapter 21, usually thought to be an appendix mentions sightings in Galilee and Jerusalem.
Acts provides a more extensive series of appearances than Luke, though written by the same author, but like it places all of these in or near Jerusalem. Two points are important: According to Luke, the first two disciples to see Jesus walked with him for several hours without recognizing him Luke also reports that Jesus could disappear and reappear at will According to these two authors, Jesus was substantially transformed, but he was not a ghost. Luke says this explicitly